Advocacy Organizations in the US Political Process
Andrews and Edwards write in their literature review about advocacy organizations that about the role of networks in legal
advocacy organizations. This scholarship is relevant to our understanding of how social media can impact legal advocacy organizations.
“There is an inverse
relationship between social homophily and networked access to resources whereby
the like-attracts-like principle of homophily leads advocacy groups over time
to develop more homogeneous memberships that leave them relatively isolated
from the surrounding social structure.
Network relations can
also provide access to key resources needed to sustain advocacy (Lin 2001).
Advocacy groups that choose to have organizational members formalize network
ties and create institutionalized ties through which resources can be shared.
Diverse organizational leaders or participants can provide connections beyond
the advocacy organization, thus establishing weak ties that broaden the
movement’s capacity (Ganz 2000). Arguably, network ties between organizations
lack strong mechanisms of accountability and responsibilities that come with
formal coalition participation." Pgs. 490-491.Kenneth T. Andrews and Bob Edwards, "Advocacy Organizations in the US Political Process." Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2004. 30:479–506 doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110542
Comments
Post a Comment